- Although it is a conference on electronic properties - and thus physics - I strongly enjoyed the talks of Fukushima (2008) and Nakanishi (2009). I would appreciate (some) more talks from the chemist`s point of view. (No nanoelectronics without nanomaterials.)
- As all of the invited talkes seem to have been recorded, it would be nice to have the possibility to review them.
- The quality of the invited talks did vary a fair bit (3 times)
- It will be a good idea if more and more young people are also given an opportunity to have oral presentation, even if it is for 15-20 minutes.
- The invited talks were ok, but they fall within a certain type of speakers who like skiing. But the posters were much worse this year than previous years. If you look at the poster subjects, you find that there are much fewer on mainline subjects, and many on strange aspects of nanotubes, nanosystems or composites, 'nanojunk', whose only function was to allow the person to attend. This suggests that the non-invited attendees fall into a clique and are not the top in their fields. May be a bit more selective.
- The poster session time is too short for us to see all.
- Too much spectroscopy devoted reports/posters
- Truly excellent!
|